![]() |
Members of the Pittsburgh community give their perspectives on the PSO. |
| Doug Bauman,
Cynthia Closkey, David DeAngelo, Bethany Hensel, Louis Luangkesorn, Jennifer McGuiggan, Elizabeth Perry
, Jennifer Pizzuto |
« January 2009 | Main | March 2009 »
08:48 PM in Bethany Hensel | Permalink | Comments (0)
As far as I can tell it was a sell-out crowd last night at Heinz Hall. While certainly well-mannered, the lines at the "Will Call" windows were frighteningly long - out the door and a quarter way up 6th street.
Good thing it wasn't rainy or sleety or icy or the line outside would have been, well, difficult to stand through.
Inside the warm dry confines of the hall, the crowd moved about excitedly, waiting for one of the most popular pieces in the repertoire, Orff's Carmina burana. In a preview piece at the Tribune-Review, Mark Kanny wrote:
The popularity of Carmina burana by Carl Orff isn't hard to figure out.
"It has lots of color and powerful rhythmic energy that erupt in every part," says Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra music director Manfred Honeck. "'Carmina Burana' is something outstanding, also, because it's a piece which illustrates key elements in the history of the 20th century in music, including irony and, especially, rhythm."
Before we look at the Orff, we should remember that there were two other pieces on the program as well.
The first, a segment of a Te Deum by a lesser known (and unfairly so) 20th Century German composer, named Walter Braunfels (1882-1954), was a lush joy. The piece had it's its première in Cologne in 1922 and according to German musicologist Frithjof Haas, one contemporary report said that it had "largest success that a première ever had in Cologne." After hearing the snippet, it's completely understandable.
Braunfels, unfortunately, had the misfortune of living in Germany as the Nazi Regime came to power while having been born with a Jewish father (his mother, by the way, was Louis Sphor's grand-niece). Braunfels was categorized by the Nazis as a "non-Aryan" and in 1933 was dismissed from all his official duties at the Hochschule für Musik Köln and forced to sell his home. By 1938 all performances of his music were banned, for "degeneracy", by the Reichsmusikkammer and he was, as they say, in internal exile until the end of the war.
After the war, he was reinstated as head of the Hochschule but by that time musical tastes had moved on and his career was never the same. Unfair. Just unfair.
Manfred Honeck has recorded the Te Deum and it's available at Amazon.com.
The next piece on the program, the Oboe Concerto by "Haydn" was wonderful. Wonderfully played by the PSO and by PSO oboeist Cynthia Koledo DeAlmeida. The cadenza at the end of the first movement was amazing. I think the word "fluttering" more than adequately describes how easily she moved from lower to upper register and than back again.
The reason I put quotation marks around Papa's name (and I'd be tempted to do that "air quotes" thing if I were reading this to you live) is because the piece has only been attributed to Haydn. In musicology-speak, "Attributed to - " translates into "almost certainly not by - "
So it's pretty much impossible to tell you anything about this currently unknown composer.
So I'll tell you a story about one of my thesis advisors (who we will name "Egon') instead. Young Egon, a Canadian, was suffering through his master's oral exams preparation and was compiling a list of poets who'd supplied texts for the composers he was studying. As he did, he repeatedly came across the name "Dichter Unbekannt." He'd never heard of Herr Unbekannt and it troubled him greatly. He was just about to approach his thesis advisors with this problem when he happened to notice in an Italian edition of one of the books he was using the Italian"anonimo" where he'd seen "Dichter Unbekannt" in his German texts.
The proverbial lightbulb went of in his head.
Decades later, he told me that at that when the lightbulb went off he felt two conflicting things; First he felt like an complete idiot for not seeing that "Dichter Unbekannt" was German for "Poet Unknown" and then he said he felt great relief for not bringing this bit of embarrassing information to his thesis committee.
Now onto the Orff. Great piece. Great performance. I mean what's not to love about a piece that uses a boys' chorus (though it was merely a soprano chorus last night - oo fugeddaboutit) to sing these words:
Translation from the PSO program notes:
What's not to love about that? Though I can tell you that when I was 10 and in a boys' chorus singing Carmina burana, we had no idea what we were singing about.
Andy Druckenbrod's review is here and he said of Friday's performance:
Classical music, that pure and refined art, always spiritually uplifting, right? Not so much, at least not when Carmina burana takes the stage.
Even if the performances are heavenly, as was the case last night at Heinz Hall, Carl Orff's masterful setting of medieval texts by students and itinerant monks remains sensuous, ribald and funny. Combined with the thrill of pounding, primitive rhythms, the energetic music is an excellent break from the more serious (though wonderful) tone of most classical music.
Mark Kanny's review is here and he said of Friday's performance:
Heinz Hall was packed Friday night -- not surprisingly -- when Manfred Honeck led three vocal soloists, the Mendelssohn Choir and the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra in Carl Orff's spectacularly popular Carmina burana.
Orff went further back in time than the neoclassical styles popular after World War I to work in the mid-1930s in a neo-primitive style that Igor Stravinsky had established in his 1913 ballet "The Rite of Spring."
Although much simpler in rhythm and harmony than the Stravinsky ballet, the energy and flamboyance of Carmina burana is irresistible. So, too, is the hypnotic lyricism.
Now for the bad part. In contrast to Braunfels' treatment at the hands of the Nazis, Orff's life in 1930s Germany was vastly different. As Ann Powers wrote in the The New York Times in 1999:
Powers continues:
Uncomfortable as that some of reads, that's the way it is.
05:28 PM in David DeAngelo | Permalink | Comments (0)
To be able to experience, live, Haydn's Oboe Concerto and Orff's Carmina burana in one evening was fortunate and exhilarating.
Haydn's Oboe Concerto is one of my favorite all time pieces. Something about it sends chills down my spine. I first heard it in the early 1990's on WQED-FM 89.3 at my work place, at lunch. A friend, after hearing me exclaim that it was a fantastic composition, told me to call the DJ and ask what it was, so I did. Paul Johnston, the DJ at the time, was glad to tell me it was Haydn's Oboe Concerto. So ever since then I've purchased a few versions, and have been waiting for the PSO to bring it to Pittsburgh. Well tonight I was not disappointed, the PSO premiere performance was just as great as I could have expected, and Cynthia Koledo DeAlmeida did a spectacular job on the Oboe.
The Carmina burana likewise did not disappoint, the live performance was so much more powerful than any prerecorded version. And what a surprise, all those lovely movements in between the opening and closing O Fortuna. This, therefore, I would consider as my first hearing of this complete piece, even though I did recognize one other movement in between. The complexion of the "O Fortuna" movement, and all the other movements, to my ears, and eyes, seemed someone different. Not knowing Latin, I did not know what they were singing, not a problem as the singing itself sounded melodious and understanding was not a requirement for enjoyment. The 'new' music showed many light, airy and beautiful parts at first, much different than the opening, and not what I expected.
Then when the solo singers began to sing what to me seemed to be a comic opera, beautifully performed, and some humorous body movements causing audience laughter, I was again surprised, pleasantly.
What is this piece? I kept wondering, it has so many elements that I find difficult to put together. All of the movements were lovely to hear, but I was in a quandary. The culmination of what seemed to be a love affair ensued, but I was not sure, and it seemed to come together at the end with a reprise of the "O Fortuna", concluding the cantata. Later, at home, I read the English translation of the "O Fortuna" (below). This seemed to indicate that perhaps this is a tragedy, and not a comedy, so again I'm confused. I see I've got some reading to do to bring myself up to speed. But the lingering impression was that the music was fantastic, and all the players of the Mendelssohn Choir of Pittsburgh, the soloists and the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra conducted by Manfred Honeck, did a fantastic job. I can't wait to experience this again, next time I'll have context.
English translation of "O Fortuna," a poem from Carmina burana
"O Fortune,
like the moon
Stands constantly changing,
ever waxing
but waning;
hateful life
now oppresses
and then soothes
as fancy takes it;
poverty
and power
it melts them like ice.
Fate - monstrous
and empty,
you whirling wheel,
stand malevolent,
well-being is vain
and always fades to nothing,
shadowed
and veiled
you plague me too;
now through the game
I bring my bare back
to your villainy.
Fate, in health
and virtue,
is against me
driven on
and weighted down,
always enslaved.
So at this hour
without delay
pluck the vibrating strings;
since Fate
strikes down the strong man,
everyone weep with me!"
12:57 PM in Doug Bauman | Permalink | Comments (0)
What exactly is Carmina burana, the "O Fortuna" music by Carl Orff? I
frankly don't know for sure. I'm writing my thoughts on what it means to me. First, I've mostly heard the approximately 2 and a half minute segment of the "O Fortuna", the most famous movement from Orff's cantata. Who hasn't heard this? It's so famous, that I suspect it is as recognizable as just about any other composition. I remember it was used in a television advertisement for the Marine Corps and one for the National Guard.
I also remember it was used in many movies, the one I remember most is in the movie 'Excalibur', 1981.
and 'The Doors', 1991.
But that's ultimately not what it means to me. To me it isn't a thought of a collective force, but rather an individual creative spark. A song of an individual who is perhaps sought by the collective, or shunned, but operates independently, on his or her own, using their own internal force, their own power of thought, reason and sense of right and wrong, in a quest to do what's right for themselves and for all, to reject the unholy or ungodly, to embrace the adventure, to endure the torment, the rejection of the collectivist or societal norms when those norms are wrong, to surmount any odds, and to do it all with a great zest, zeal and humor presented forward and outwards, a certain unalienable smile and jovial spirit, to quench the thirst for the adventurer himself, as a kind of pirate with a gentleman's charm.
Indeed this music is compelling, the kind that drives man to passion, to movement, to action. It distinctly has that effect on me. To achieve, to write, to invent, any creative individualist act that I can think of, to type faster, to produce, without hesitation, something, I know not what, and yet it is there. But it is too short in that form, I'm awaiting the rest of it, I'm wanting more. I could listen to that segment, part of that O Fortuna movement again, and I will. But I will hear the whole cantata performed by the Pittsburgh Symphony on Saturday night, and I will write more.
I've found out since that:
09:45 AM in Doug Bauman | Permalink | Comments (0)
Decisions, decisions, how do I choose?
I've got to decide which concert series I want to purchase for the PSO 2009-2010 season. I have the schedule in front of me (call 412-392-4900 to get yours). It's always so hard to choose when everything is great!
Here are a few of the highlights:
Now here are a few of the things I will be looking for:
08:52 PM in Doug Bauman | Permalink | Comments (1)
I thought that Andrés Cárdenes was sensational with the solo and together with the PSO on Friday night, they performed a fantastic rendition of Symphonie espagnole by Édouard Lalo. I've heard that piece before, but I've never seen it live. It is a piece of music I very much liked already, and this performance was even better than any I recall. I watched Mr. Cárdenes play. It was amazing to me how quickly his fingers moved over the violin, at how well it sounded. I can't even conceive of anything requiring that much dexterity, and his adroitness was apparent. I just wanted to say congratulations on a fantastic concert performance. I hope we hear more of Mr. Cárdenes in the upcoming 2009-2010 season as well.
08:22 PM in Doug Bauman | Permalink | Comments (0)
This evening my lovely wife and I braved the newly (though sadly temporary) mild Pittsburgh weather and made our way to Heinz Hall to hear Rafael Frühbeck de Burgos conduct the PSO.
It was a lovely lasagna-fueled evening for the both of us.
First off, let me clear away all the barely necessary preliminaries: It was a very good concert - solidly well played with no bad news to report here at all. I only say that because Friday night, the PSO wasn't so lucky:
Everyone has a bad day at the office now and then, but for those whose workplace is in front of fans or audience members, it's harder to hide it.
Such was the case [Friday] night at Heinz Hall, when concertmaster Andrés Cárdenes never quite got on track in Lalo's "Symphonie Espagnole" and then in a shocker, lost his place in the final movement. That required the conductor, Rafael Fruhbeck de Burgos, to ask the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra to restart it.
P-G Music critic Andy Druckenbrod later on in the review gives Cárdenes the benefit of the doubt. I'd say Andy's got it exactly right here. I've heard Cárdenes play enough times to know he's an intelligent and steady musician with an agile technique and a full, powerful sound. Andy's right that everyone has a bad day. Friday night, Cárdenes had his. Tonight, he was completely on his game. Completely.
In his late 70s, Frühbeck de Burgos can certainly be a good candidate for the title of "old school conductor." Rather dapper in his White Tie and Tails (no Top Hat, sorry) with his white hair combed back from his forehead, he conducted old school Eurpoean with a baton roughly the length of a Louisville Slugger. To my ear it was an evening of solid, if not necessarily challenging, readings.
On the other hand I was surprised to see the order of the compositions. I would have thought that the weighty Beethoven would have gone last with the dashing Ravel somewhat earlier. My guess is that the idea behind this evening's program was that the crowdpleaser always goes on last and Bolero is nothing if not a crowd pleaser. Just ask Bo Derek.
The Beethoven
Beethoven's so-called "Middle Period" symphonies tended to be composed in pairs. The 5th and 6th were composed somewhere between 1805-8 and premiered on the same day in 1808. The 7th and 8th were composed somewhere between 1811-12 and premiered within a couple of months of each other in late 1813 and early 1814. The 8th, by the way, was the last symphony Beethoven was to complete before the "Glorious" Ninth of 1824.
It's been said that the thing to remember about the composers of the first Vienese School (i.e. Haydn, Mozart and Beethoven) is that they were all opera composers at heart. Mozart's opera output is well-known, Haydn's, on the other hand, is less so. And Beethoven was always a composer hunting for the perfect libretto. Just look at how he worked and reworked Fidelio. The point, flawed as it may be, is that the three were very much interested in the drama that can be presented as music. It is this drama that Frühbeck de Burgos was able to present to us this evening. His Beethoven was clear and crisp without being fragile on the one hand or too muscle bound on the other. The recapitulation towards the end of the first movement was a particularly effective (and affective) moment. Old school rules, I guess.
The Lalo
For all his obvious compositional talents (and they are considerable) Edouard Lalo is no Beethoven. While certainly a strong composition, Lalo's Symphonie Espagnole comes off, when stood up next to the Beethoven symphony that preceeded it by 60 years, as something less. Less deep. Less complicated. Less interesting. Before we go any further, however, let me add that when Billy Ripkin (Cal's younger brother) was being heckled from the stands for not being as good a baseball player as his more famous brother, he reportedly responded, "Yea, but who is?" So Lalo isn't as good as Beethoven. But who is?
This was the piece that vexed Cárdenes and the PSO the night before. Tonight he was great. To his credit he made out of a good piece a great performance and deserved the standing ovation he got.
The Ravel
Ah, the crowdpleaser. A 17 minute long "experiment" (Ravel's description) where nothing much happens except the orchestration keeps getting thicker and the band keeps getting louder. The PSO handled this piece with great aplomb. By the end my ears were ringing and I feared I'd lost, permanently, some hearing. My wife feard that the snare drummers arms would fall off. This piece got a standing ovation as well.
I'm looking forward to hearing Carmina Burana next week.
09:39 AM in David DeAngelo | Permalink | Comments (0)
Was struck tonight by how still this violinist kept her feet - the light gleamed off her shoes - no matter how wild, how thrilling, how dynamic the music. Beethoven, Lalo, Ravel - all her physical expression went into playing, while her feet were motionless, as if drawing energy from their contact with the stage floor.
09:34 AM in Elizabeth Perry | Permalink | Comments (1)
Everyone who attends the concerts of the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra at Heinz Hall, or throughout the premier concert locations across the globe, know of the quality of the musicians. Much is said of all the instruments, including just about every instrument without strings. I quite agree. But what about the string section..? I myself am extremely impressed with the richness, the fullness, the tonal quality and aggregate capacity exemplified by the string section of the PSO. Sometimes I wonder why they don't get the same kind of credit at the end of a piece. Sure, they ask all those other nice players to stand up and take a bow, certainly well deserved; but it seems almost afterthought for the strings. Well it turns out I'm not the only one to appreciate the PSO string section. During a concert chat last week with Gabriela Montero, she revealed her thoughts (about 2 minutes in):
Gabriela Montero: "I have to say I'm so happy to be here.
This is such an amazing group of musicians,
and now that I was listening to the Mendelssohn,
the sound they have, the richness and depth is gorgeous
and I like that, I like the meaty stuff."
Jim Cunningham:
"And we liked they way you played the Rhapsody in Blue.
It was absolutely sensational."
Applause!
This is my interpretation, that she was referring to the string section in particular, because of the 'richness and depth,' and of course, the 'meaty stuff'
09:33 AM in Doug Bauman | Permalink | Comments (0)
Recent Comments